منابع مشابه
A Logical Calculus of Meaning and Synonymy
In his development of formal semantics for natural language Montague [1970a]– Montague [1973], Richard Montague modeled the meaning (Frege’s sense) of a term A by its Carnap intension CI(A), the function which assigns to each state a, specifying a “possibleworld”, “time” and“context of use”, the denotationden(A)(a) of A in that state. Now this is surely not right: among other things, it makes “...
متن کاملStructural Isomorphism of Meaning and Synonymy
In this paper I am going to deal with the phenomenon of synonymy from the logical point of view. In Transparent Intensional Logic (TIL), which is my background theory, the sense of an expression is an algorithmically structured procedure detailing what operations to apply to what procedural constituents to arrive at the object (if any) denoted by the expression. Such procedures are rigorously d...
متن کاملvalidation of a revised logical-mathematical intelligence scale and exploring its relationship with english language proficiency
نظریه هوش چندگانه قسمتهای متفاوت هوش بشری را مورد بررسی قرار می دهد که با شناخت آن شخص به درک بهتری از توانایی های خود میرسد و در نتیجه سعی در استفاده از آن جهت یادگیری بهتر میکند. همچنین با شناخت استعداد دانش آموزان، فرایند یادگیری بهتر میشود. هدف از انجام دادن این تحقیق بررسی رابطه بین هوش ریاضی و استعداد یادگیری زبان انگلیسی میباشد. برای انجام این تحقیق از پرسشنامه هوش ریاضی که توسط شیرر در ...
A Logical Process Calculus
This paper presents the Logical Process Calculus (LPC), a formalism that supports heterogeneous system specifications containing both operational and declarative subspecifications. Syntactically, kPC extends Milner's Calculus of Conmmnicating Systems with operators fl'om the alternation free linear time p calculus (kT#). Semantically, kPC is equipped with a behavioral preorder that generalizes ...
متن کاملCompositionality, Synonymy, and the Systematic Representation of Meaning
In a recent issue of Linguistics and Philosophy Kasmi and Pelletier (1998) (K&P), and Westerstahl (1998) criticize Zadrozny's (1994) argument that any semantics can be represented compositionally. The argument is based upon Zadrozny's theorem that every meaning function m can be encoded by a function \mu such that (i) for any expression E of a specified language L, m(E) can be recovered from \m...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Linguistics and Philosophy
سال: 2006
ISSN: 0165-0157,1573-0549
DOI: 10.1007/s10988-005-6920-7